StoreSecurity SalonInto The BreachContact

Archive for February, 2006

Security Catalyst 19 - The Secrets of Risk Management (With Ron Woerner)

I had the opportunity yesterday to speak with Ron Woerner about Risk Management… and I was so impressed and excited about the tips and advice that he shared that I decided to get this out to you right away.

Ron Woerner is an expert in information security and has spearheaded an effort to develop an effective risk management program for a large company. He agreed to speak with me about his experiences - and provides great ideas, insights and information that we can all use!

I want to thank Ron for speaking with us and for sending along some resources. I’ve actually invited Ron to present on “FREE SECURITY” in an upcoming free teleseminar for our newsletter subscribers. Subscribe today so you don’t miss the resources he is going to share.

If you enjoyed this interview, please tell a friend, colleague or other security professional — this is an important topic, and the 25 minutes Ron shared will help anyone save a lot of time and money!

Risk Management Resources

Read the rest of this entry »

 
icon for podpress  Episode 20 [25:34m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Posted in Information Protection | Print this post Print this post | | Comments

THE OLYMPICS HAS EVERYTHING THIS YEAR: SPORTS, MEDALS AND HACKERS

by: Bill Matherly Jr.

As the world watches the winter Olympics unfold this year on television, there was an interesting story developing behind the scenes that little actually know about. A would be hacker issued a threat to attack the internal computing structure of the Turin Olympic Committee last week.

The individual a technical consultant for the TOROC committee gained unauthorized access to classified sections of the network. The reason for the breech in security or for the threat was not immediately known but with the quick reaction from law enforcement and the other computer security professional, steps were taken to mitigate the cyber attack.

This situation only disturbs me in the notion that, companies and various organizations have always been very weary about enlisting the technical prowess of a “hacker” to secure their proprietary network, the sensitive information and the contents of that thereof.

While it’s difficult to know which individuals are capable of fulfilling such internal attacks, it’s the responsibility of the company or organization who hire these types of individuals to make a strict effort to collect as much background information on the applicate applying for the responsibility to care for their intellectual properties, intellectual computer network and systems as possible.

A series of background checks on a per individual basis, could have indicated the type of ethics an applicant has and could have sent up some potential red flags that would be some sort of indication that trusting a certain individual with this type of control could be proven to be detrimental.

Instead in this instance the Olympic Committee, decided to opt for the standard public relations practice of spinning this off as “the person we trusted to care for our network, turned out to be a malicious hacker…”. This is not effective in addressing the underlying issue. The issue is NOT the person gained unauthorized access to a network, while as disturbing as that is, the underlying issue is that Olympic Committee failed to take the necessary risk assessment to ensure that type of cyber terrorism performed on a global scale would not happen.
Bill Matherly is a computer security consultant in Oklahoma City, and is a regular contributor of The Security Catalyst website. He can be reached via email at bill.matherly.jr@gmail.com. All views and opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily the views and opinions of The Security Catalyst web site or administrators.

Posted in Information Protection | Print this post Print this post | | Comments

Security Catalyst Featured on Working Podcast

I was recently invited by Drew at The Working Podcast to talk about email security. You can listen to the episode, #43, by clicking here:

You can find episode #43 of the Working Podcast by clicking here
Let me now what you think and thanks for the support.

If you are thinking of looking for a new job, or sometimes feel lost in cubicle land, check out the other episodes of the working podcast. I think you’ll be pleased that you did. Look for a guest spot from Andrew with some job seeking guidance in the future.

Posted in Information Protection | Print this post Print this post | | Comments

Security Catalyst 18 (In the Trenches Interview with FBI Special Agent Jim Beane)

I am pleased to offer you Security Catalyst 18, an “In the trenches” edition that focuses on Cyber and Homeland Security. The current belief is that 85% or more of our critical infrastructure that needs to be protected is owned and operated by the private sector. So how do we effectively share information with the government and what should we be doing to protect ourselves? This show is geared for anyone interested in Homeland Security - especially if you want to make a difference.

One program available to US citizens and companies is Infragard - the joint partnership between the FBI and corporations to foster that cooperation. I recently was able to interview Special Agent Jim Beane, from the Albany, NY Division about his experience in the FBI as it related to cybercrime, homeland security and InfraGard.

Special Agent Beane candidly shares some insights about the value of sharing information, as well as dispells some myths and provides important information on how we can better help in the effort to secure cyberspace and protect our homeland.

If you have questions about membership in InfraGard or cybercrime that were not addressed, please send me an email to securitycatalyst@gmail.com and I will work to get them answered for you.

Links and Information

Read the rest of this entry »

 
icon for podpress  Episode 18 [20:50m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Posted in Information Protection | Print this post Print this post | | Comments (1)

Good Grief Google!

Last week the The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), an online privacy advocacy group, issued a statement discouraging Internet users from using the Google Desktop software because of a feature that could allow Google to copy the contents of your hard drive.

Google was already under privacy scrutiny for it’s stance against the United States government in trying to keep public search records from it’s popular search engines private. Google has now done an about face in it’s apparent stance on user privacy.

Okay, let me get this straight. The United States Government has no business knowing what a search for using Google’s search engine but my document, excel spreadsheet and other classified files that I store on my hard drive is open season for the world to see? Sounds like another interesting but a dangerous game of “double standard” is being played out on a more disturbing scale.

It’s important to realize that this feature which Google has dubbed “Search Across Computers” can be easily disabled from within the Google Desktop software, but what happens when a feature like this becomes enabled by default? Especially, without the explicit knowledge of the end user.

Google realizes that it sets the bar quite high and prides themselves as the leader in technology concept development and implementation which causes it’s competitors to play “catch up”. While this might sound a lot like “Chicken Little”. However, I for one and I am sure others in the computer security profession cringe at the thought of other companies like Yahoo, Time Warner and Microsoft who may think that duplicating their own versions of “Search Across Computers” is mandatory to compete for advertising dollars.

To sum up this latest installment of mine, security again, has taken a deliberate back seat to “functionality.

Bill Matherly is a computer security consultant in Oklahoma City, and is a regular contributor of The Security Catalyst website. He can be reached via email at bill.matherly.jr@gmail.com. All views and opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily the views and opinions of The Security Catalyst web site or administrators.

Posted in Information Protection | Print this post Print this post | | Comments (2)

The Security Brrreeeport

Robert Scoble, the Microsoft Geek Blogger, is tweaking the blogging meme-tracking community, and we want to contribute to the security section of the brrreeeport blog network. So, here’s our entry.

Please check our main blog, http://www.securitycatalyst.com for lots of good information, including a variety of excellent podcasts for your listening enjoyment.

Posted in Information Protection | Print this post Print this post | | Comments

Security Catalyst 17 (Home User Security - Email and Browsers)

This is our second special episode focusing on Home User security issues. Today we focus on email clients and browsers - and the basic steps you need to take to protect yourself. Michael is joined by special guest Bill Matherly, Jr. - and they describe the actions they take to protect themselves, and their friends and family.

Listen to the show to see which programs and configurations we recomend to our family and friends. As our new friends, you’ll want to make use of our links and information to keep yourself protected!

Links and Information

Read the rest of this entry »

 
icon for podpress  Episode 17 [31:09m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Posted in Uncategorized | Print this post Print this post | | Comments

Assessing Compliance

One of the areas I seem to be spending a lot of time helping clients lately is handling the broad topic of compliance. Now some of you might be shuddering at mere mention of the word “compliance” (or perhaps you have a different emotion). However, I’m not in that camp, because the compliance efforts I have been part of have really been designed to improve security - and reduce costs (over time). I think that using compliance as a driver is really an opportunity that we, as security professionals, have to seize to prove that security can be a strong benefit to an organization.

Here are some of the lessons I have learned (thus far) that may help you in your efforts:

1. We need to make sure we avoid white washing our compliance efforts. I have seen more than a handful of organizations go from 30% compliant to 90% compliant in week - because they simply checked a box on a form (but didn’t actually do the work)!

As the crunch of deadlines looms closer, some organizations have a mandate to show progress… which is sometimes misrepresented. The problem with this approach is that it leads to a false sense of security and may even land you in some trouble in the future. As a security professional, it is our duty to make sure we help to protect our organizations and avoid whitewashing over compliance directives.

2. Practice diligent risk management. Institute a good framework for risk management — which requires you to stop and think! To be effective, you have to take the time for assessment, then seek to understand your risk and take appropriate action.

3. Focus on asset-based risk assessment. As part of your risk management plan, I encourage you to expand beyond technology-only assessments and get engaged in the organization to uncover the true assets. Once you understand your business, you will be in a better position to take action.

What I especially like about taking an asset-based approach is the transformation that is likely in your colleagues. By involving the entire team in the process, everyone begins to understand the assets of the organization and the related risks in a more complete way. In the end, this leads to an organization that is better protected.

There is little need to reinvent the wheel these days. Here are some of the frameworks I have used to help me in these projects:

OCTAVE: http://www.cert.org/octave/

FIPS-199: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips199/FIPS-PUB-199-final.pdf

NIST 800-30: Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-30/sp800-30.pdf

If you have something different you use, please send me an email and I’ll add it to the list!

*** If you would like more updates and insights like this, please consider joining the security insider mailing list ***

Posted in Information Protection | Print this post Print this post | | Comments

OneCare: Microsoft’s SECOND Attempt At Computer Security

It’s all the talk at the moment in various computer security discussions around the world. Microsoft has announced plans to launch a new subscription based service for it’s reincarnation computer security service entitled “Windows: OneCare Live”.

Did I say “reincarnation”? Indeed I did. Many computer security professionals such as myself, remember the days of MS DOS and Windows 3.1. Specifically, MS DOS 6 in which Microsoft made it’s first attempt at virus detection and removal with a product simply known as Microsoft Anti virus or MAV for short.

While the concept was a step in the right direction for the software giant, and was a product a head of it’s time, it became known to be one of Microsoft’s greatest failures. Microsoft and computer security giant Symantec briefly teamed up to provide a stripped down DOS version of Symantec’s Norton Antivirus product for Microsoft’s exclusive use. A dream come true, at least in concept.

Implementation, however was another story all together. Plagued with a plethora of problems ranging from lack of user knowledge in proper computing security practices and mediocre virus definition updates (you were lucky to get an update once every six months) made Microsoft’s first bid at providing computer security the absolute joke of the computer security industry.

As the years passed, and viral attacks have become more sophisticated exploiting every single service bundled within the Windows operating system, Microsoft soon felt the consumer pressure of having to once again to take a proactive stance in protecting not only consumer computer systems world wide but it’s own integrity they are now making a come back with Windows: OneCare.

Bundled with this new creation will be a spyware detection and removal service, currently dubbed “Microsoft Anti-Spyware”, and a viral detection software both byproducts from the same security firm that Microsoft purchased in a couple of years back to aid in their fight in gaining the upper hand in computer security.

Unlike it’s first generation ancestor, this service will not be offered complimentary to faithful Windows users. In fact, Microsoft refused to issue a security fix for the most recent “Kama Sutra” worm vulnerability but those whom purchased a beta subscription to the OneCare program were given the added assurance that Microsoft would clean the infection if present on a purchasers computer system.

Great, Microsoft has again disappointed computer security professions. The first time was based on poor technology and update policies, now the disappointment lies in poor business practices.

I am quite content with my Bit-Defender “FREE” edition and Lavasoft’s Ad-aware product, that while doesn’t carry the Microsoft brand, it also doesn’t carry the Microsoft headaches.

“Bushwick” better known as Bill Matherly is a computer security consultant currently residing in Oklahoma. If you have questions, comments or concerns about this article you can email him directly at bill.matherly.jr@gmail.com. All views and opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily the views and opinions of The Security Catalyst web site or administrators.

Posted in Information Protection | Print this post Print this post | | Comments (1)

Security Catalyst 16 (Protecting Your Cell, AOL to charge for spam?)

It’s been a slow week for security - which could be the calm before another storm. Join us this week as a listener shares some insights on how to protect your cell phone number (and takes it to the telemarketers), we discuss AOL’s plan to charge for sending emails to AOL subscribers, and we examine if we cried wolf during kama sutra, or averted a disaster. I also introduce a new project I am working on and ask for some help.

Links and Information

Read the rest of this entry »

 
icon for podpress  Episode 16 [19:52m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Posted in Information Protection | Print this post Print this post | | Comments

« Previous entries