It seems that this year has been dominated by negativity: we have focused on month’s of bugs, slammed colleagues and users and even tried to prove through science that people don’t understand risk. In fact, many in our industry seem quick to point out that everything is wrong, nothing works…. and that’s not very comforting.
As I have traveled around the country, hosted some informal gatherings and met with friends and clients, I’ve been struck by how people, in general, look and act. Most of the people I have met in security seem “down”, rushed, angry and lacking hope.
So we start a year where we feel down trodden, upset, dejected and hopeless?
Open Culture (http://www.oculture.com/weblog/2007/03/famous_stanford.html) recently ran a story about the (in)famous Stanford Prison Experiment. After reading it, I remembered back to the first day of my new job after college. My first boss sat me down and told me, “Don’t F*** up, because if you do, the whole world will crush you. If you do a good job, no one will notice, and that’s okay.” In my experience, those words have sometimes been accurate. Since I “got my start,” I have always remembered that first conversation - mainly in the context of watching how many people in technology have been treated and how they chose to treat others.
Practicing Security Today is like the Famous Stanford Prison Experiment
The Stanford prison experiment was a psychological study of the human response to captivity, in particular to the real world circumstances of prison life and the effects of imposed social roles on behaviour. It was conducted in 1971 by a team of researchers led by Philip Zimbardo of Stanford University. Undergraduate volunteers played the roles of guards and prisoners living in a mock prison that was constructed in the basement of the Stanford psychology building.
– Wikipedia entry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment)
In the experiment, the behaviors of both the guards and the prisoners escalated quite quickly as each took on characteristics of their role — to the point where the experiment was ended early.
You can learn more here:
Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment
The Official Website: http://www.prisonexp.org/
interesting overview: http://www.holah.karoo.net/zimbardostudy.htm
Some of you are probably reading this, recalling the experiment from your college days and wondering… do I think that we are the prisoners or the guards? Short answer is: “yes.”
Reading about and remembering my cursory study of the Stanford prison experiment also made me realize that as “protecting information” has grown in importance, many people in the field of security have been given an opportunity they have never held - a chance to influence and sometimes to enforce. After years of receiving abuse, they find themselves in positions of power - and sometimes without guidance. So we take a reactive and negative approach to those around us. Perhaps some of our colleagues “assume the position” too much and get a bit carried away?
In some cases, we have folks that act like the guards; some act like prisoners and some, I believe, *were* prisoners that now have the role of guard - and they have a lot of memories guiding their actions.
Now, let me be clear - with all the plight in the world today, I’m not suggesting that we, collectively, take our practice of security to the extremes of the prison experiment. In fact, I’m not suggesting a direct comparison. I just happened to review an article on the topic a few weeks back and it has stuck with me that our practice of security might be allowing people to embellish their roles.
Regardless, this is a situation we cannot accept. Period.
We cannot accept this approach: reboot the industry
What happens when your computer doesn’t respond as you would like? Many of us check for run away processes and consult the logs. If you’ve ever worked with windows or supported windows users, a more common answer is: reboot the system.
In security today, I suspect we could “check the logs” and look for runaway processes, but I feel like we need a reboot. We have to flush from memory the bad blood and old experiences and get started with a clean(er) slate. We need a fresh start (or a least a fresh approach).
I believe that the better way to practice the protection of information protection is through a positive approach that stresses inclusion and builds partnerships. In the last year, I have watched people in our industry alienate the very people that have helped them. I have coached organizations away from taking a punitive approach to security. I have confessed that I love to learn, love to teach and truly enjoy working to simplify security and relate our concepts to people in a language they understand.
In Speaking About Security, we explore the power of the narrative. We learn through story (you can really see this in children). On a recent flight home, I was treated to “Night at the Museum” (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0477347/). While it might not have been a movie I would have normally selected, I was amazed by the story. Without revealing details, the success came after abandoning a process of restriction and following a path of inclusion.
I’m not suggesting that Hollywood holds the answers, but we cannot ignore the fact that the “story” of this movie and the movie itself were both successful. They are natural to the human experience and something we need to strive for in our practice of security (and the protection of information).
After reboot: It’s time to get grounded and follow a new vision for security
I believe in a new vision. I see a way to practice security that minds the past while focusing on the basics. The future for us focuses on protecting information - and everyone has a role. Protecting information is dialogue; it cannot be simply a directive. The current strategy of relying solely on technology is not working, and it’s time to follow a better way. I believe that means we have to follow an inclusive strategy.
We have to foster a sense of trust among each other and our users. We have to reintroduce the concept of accountability and foster a culture that embraces and expects personal responsibility.
I tend to be the sort of person who prefers action to words. This approach influenced me to share more of my ideas through the blog and podcast this year and led me to create the inclusive and supportive Security Catalyst Community (http://community.securitycatalyst.com/forums/index.php). As that community continues to grow and thrive, I have met many other passionate professionals that have challenged and supported my growth - reinforcing to me that collaborating with others can be truly powerful.
I have decided to spend some time focusing on three key areas:
1. Architecting a shared new vision for approaching how we can protect information (security). It’s not *my* vision - it’s *our* vision and I invite you to join in the conversation and practice a new way.
2. Help security professionals find their voice. As a parent, I have watched my children struggle with communication and sometimes resort to hitting, tantrums or what we generally call “melt-downs.” I believe that our success in security is tied to our ability to successfully communicate in speaking, writing and presentations.
3. Providing organizations and security professionals the support needed to be successful at our jobs.
I have decided that for our profession to effectively protect information, I want to help each of you become more successful in what you do.
Supporting Your Growth and Development
Through a lot of conversations with clients, friends and even ISSA and Infragard chapters, it was revealed to me that I was already offering some of what people were looking for. As a result, I have improved some programs we already developed and accelerated the development of some new ones.
To help people get grounded, focused and be able to “do more with less” without burning out, we have updated “Are you making a living or making a life?” - which is now available in a keynote, workshop and private workshop session. It’s an approach that shares how we can break the cycle, lead more “integrated lives” - as opposed to seeking “balance” - and build more effective relationships with those around us. Rather than acting out the Prison Experiment, it allows us to pursue a strategy of inclusion, to work together to protect information.
In March, we launched “Speaking About Security” to improve the ability of security professionals to communicate more effectively, inspiring their colleagues to take action.
Mike Rothman and I just announced the formation of the Security Education Network (SEN), which includes the Security Salons I have been forming, as a method to provide the information, insights and support needed to bring your performance to a new level. I’ll be writing more about that in the coming days.
This summer I launch my book, “Into the Breach: Why Corporations Fail to Protect Sensitive Information - and What Can be Done About It” — where we explore breaches and propose an approach to protecting information that allows business leaders to shift their culture away from the “security diet” to a “mindset of protecting information.” I look forward to sharing this with you.
We’re currently working on some different ways to get some needed information, resources and training to you. As soon as some plans firm up, I’ll make some announcements.
I am excited about this journey. I am passionate about my focus and my ability to help guide you and your organization. I firmly believe we need to learn from the past and work toward a better way. I offer up my approach of positive reinforcement, inclusion and education. I look forward to blending my passion, insights and approach with yours and with those of others. It’s time for a change, and I’m excited!
We plant plants…
We show you how to improve your gardening skills…
You grow gardens.
PS: I think I have finally fixed the formatting issues. - Santa 11:19a
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!